México and the US

Source: The Economist

In early February 1848, following a short and one-sided war, México agreed to cede more than half its territory to the United States. An area covering most of present-day Arizona, California, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah, plus parts of several other states, was handed over to the US. 

The rebellious state of Tejas, which had declared its independence from México in 1836, was recognised as American soil too. 

But a century and a half later, communities have proved more durable than borders. The counties with the highest concentration of Mexicans (as defined by ethnicity, rather than citizenship) overlap closely with the area that belonged to México before the great US land-grab of 1848. Some are recent arrivals; others trace their roots to long before the map was redrawn. They didn’t jump the border—it jumped them.

The Alianza del Pacífico signs a historic agreement

Alianza del Pacífico countries in blue and observer states in brown

The Alianza del Pacífico agreement signed on 10  February 2014 aims to eliminate most trade and non-trade barriers between Perú, Chile, Colombia and México and also improve the mobility of capital and people. It will also reduce members’ export dependence on single goods (in the cases of Peru, Chile and Colombia) or single markets (as in the case of Mexico), and will create economies of scale that will make it easier to compete with Asian markets.

The Landmark agreement

The landmark framework agreement covers a wide range of topics, ranging from the elimination of trade and non-trade barriers on 92pc of the goods traded within the bloc to the adoption of measures to improve the mobility of capital and people. The countries making up the trade bloc have a combined population of over 210m people, a total GDP of US$2trn (and a per-head GDP in excess of US$10,000) and account for around 40pc of all foreign trade and inward foreign investment flows to the Américas (not including the US). The Alianza del Pacífico is due to increase shortly with Costa Rica just been accepted to begin the formal membership process.In addition, the Alianza del Pacífico’s goal of strengthening ties with the Asia-Pacific region means that a broader trade bloc in the Américas will join ongoing talks to create the Trans-Pacific Partnership (a free-trade area comprising Australia, Brunei, Chile, Canada, Japan, Malaysia, México, New Zealand, Perú, Singapore, the US and Vietnam). 

A massive opportunity

The recent agreement has been welcomed in the countries of the Alianza del Pacífico, where it as seen as a massive opportunity for achieving complementarities among its members. México is set to strengthen its intra-bloc exports of value-added manufactures, such as automobiles and metal-mechanics goods. Colombia is expected to benefit from increased exports of basic manufactures, such as processed foods, clothing and leather. And Chile and Perú are likely to boost their cross-border sales of agro-industrial goods. 

Furthermore, the Alianza del Pacífico constitutes an opportunity to build strong intra-bloc competitive advantages to penetrate Asian markets. This would be achieved through the creation of productive chains that generate economies of scale. According to a study by the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), these chains could include the production of fibres and carpets by Perú and Chile; phosphates and detergents between Mexico and Perú; wood, paper and cardboard between Chile and Colombia; and chemicals and plastics between Colombia and México. 

But there will be challenges ahead

The Alianza del Pacífco’s success also hinges on its capacity to put in place accords in other, non-trade related areas. Progress has been made on the elimination of visas, the establishment of joint embassies in many Asian countries, and the subscription of agreements to promote education, tourism, small and medium enterprises and infrastructure investment. 

However, advances have been limited in more complex areas, such as the harmonisation of customs procedures, rules of origin and tax and financial sector regulation. The lack of progress in the latter two areas, for example, is delaying the implementation of the Mercado Integrado Latinoamericano (MILA, which aims to create a single stock market between Chile, Colombia and Perú and México).

Finally, although it is clear that the Alianza del Pacífico does not have political motivations, Mercosur comprised of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay and Venezuela and the Alianza Bolivariana para los Pueblos de Nuestra America (ALBA) which includes Antigua and Barbuda, Bolivia, Cuba, Dominica, Ecuador, Nicaragua, St Vincent and the Grenadines and Venezuela are likely to see the recent advances as a threat to their political ideology and existence.

APEC Indonesia 2013

APEC Family Photo of Leaders

APEC continues to go from strength to strength, with an ever-expanding agenda, and an impressive share of the world economy held by its 21 members: this year, APEC accounts for 55pc of global GDP, 44pc of trade and 40pc of the world's people which shows just how dynamic and prosperous the region is becoming.

APEC's aim was never to be a negotiating forum. Its guiding principle is “concerted unilateralism”, that is, it has no power to force its members to do anything; it merely seeks to inspire good policy by example and co-ordination. This is where APEC's real accomplishment lies within a region not accustomed to working and coordinating together in a similar way to the the EU regional supranationalism integration. Instead APEC has developed many technical committees doing useful work in areas such as trade facilitation. It helps foster habits of consultation and co-operation. And, furthermore, its Leaders’ meetings provide an opportunity for useful and sometimes informal bilateral talks.

Since the Doha round of world-trade talks more or less came to a stand still with almost no hope of moving forward in the foreseeable future, APEC’s ambitions have spread into other areas. This year its motto is “resilient Asia-Pacific: Engine of Global Growth”, and its three main themes are the Bogor goals; improving “connectivity” (infrastructure, harmonising procedures and making it easier for people to travel); and “sustainable growth with equity”.

APEC's core interest has always been trade liberalisation. Twelve of its members (including two of the three biggest economies, the US and Japan, but not China) are pursuing the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), an ambitious “21st-century” free-trade pact, covering areas such as labour, government procurement, state-owned enterprises, intellectual property and e-commerce, as well as traditional merchandise trade.

Meanwhile, eight TPP members (but not the US), along with four other APEC members (including China) as well as India and three other non-APEC countries are talking about yet another regional trade group, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership.

The Latin American member economies, Chile, Perú and México are also pursuing the "Alianza del Pacífico" in the hope that a stronger regional alliance will give them more bargaining power in their trade relations with China. 

All, this adds up to a very dynamic Asia Pacific region. Hence a possible further grand aim for APEC over the next decade may be to try to co-ordinate these parallel processes, in the hope of bringing them all together in a grand Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific eventually. This is a role that APEC is well prepared for given its twenty or more years of existence across the Asia Pacific region and its technical expertise on trade liberalisation.

Trade in the 21st century

Global Trade patterns in the 21st Century are changing

The trade bargains to be had

In an ideal world a big trade deal would be global. This is because gains such as dismantling trade barriers for all is much better than lowering them on a regional basis. But since the Doha round of multilateral trade talks collapsed in 2008, in its place have sprung up three possible regional deals to be done. The first two are of great significance for the future of global trade. The third is of lesser significance.

The Tran-Pacific Partnership (TPP) was launched in June 2005 between 11 Pacific countries, it includes the US, México, Canada, Chile, Perú, Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei, New Zealand and Australia. It is currently into its 16th round of negotiations and the approximate value of trade is around $US1.492bn. Japan and South Korea are not involved in these negotiations as yet but if they were to join the TPP countries would account for around 30pc of global trade in goods and services. Interestingly, the TPP has aspirations to do much more than cut tariffs. Its goal is to develop a far bigger joint rule book, from regulation to competition policy. One study estimated that a deal could raise the region's GDP by more than 1pc.

To compete with the TPP is another regional trade agreement the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEC) that has just been launched in 2012, it includes the 10 ASEAN countries plus China, Japan, India, South Korea, New Zealand and Australia. This deal represents an approximate value of trade around $US1,412bn even without the US' involvement. Hence there are two competing Pacific regional deals to be done: One with China plus Pacific countries and one between Américas countries (US + Canada, México etc) and Asian countries. The risk here is that both these deals could split the world into competing regional blocks where each country would need to decide who the more important business partner is: China or the US. But this could be avoided by making sure that both deals are easily knitted together and easily opened to others by basing the deal on a similar template, avoiding unnecessarily restrictive prescriptions and by creating a set of rules that both China and the US can embrace.

Finally, there is a third smaller agreement on the horizon that is being pushed hard by Europe, called the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) between the US and the EU. It was announced in February 2013 but it has not been formally launched. It's estimated value of trade would be less than half of the other two Pacific deals estimated at around $US618bn. It is not entirely clear what the purpose of this deal would be as the US is already engaged in the TPP negotiations. It would appear that Europe is slightly displaced in the 21st Century and is seeking to counter the Pacific regional deals with an Atlantic deal but this sounds rather like wanting to turn the clock back to the 20th century rather than looking forward to the realities of the 21st century.

Why free trade is good

Since the failure of the Doha Round in 2008 the WTO has struggled to rebuild interest in trade liberalisation. But, interestingly, global trade has grown faster than world output since 2010. One of the biggest problems is that decades of talks and treaties in the 20th century have exhausted many of the easy targets of trade liberalisation with the consequence that no new grand achievements are possible without resolution of some of the stickiest of trade issues. Furthermore, protectionism that has been largely held at bay, so far, throughout the economic crisis is beginning to become apparent in some places in the US and Europe. The video below offers a 1951 view of global trade and illustrates why we need free trade agreements: 

 

China and the other BRICS

But the fundamental strain on the multilateral system is the shifting economic balance of power. Emerging markets came into their own early in the Doha round that started in 2001, by rejecting the unappealing offers from the US and Europe. In fact the BRICS have become much more active over the last decade so much so that China's new President Xi Jin Ping习近平 announced that as part of his first foreign trips abroad he would be attending the fifth BRICS Summit on March 26-27 in Durban, South Africa after visiting Russia, Tanzania, and the Republic of Congo. This re-enforced the importance that China is attributing to its relationship with fellow BRIC countries, placing it on on a similar par to its strategic relationships with Russia and Africa.

The main outcome of the BRICS' Leader's Summit was to endorse plans to create a joint foreign exchange reserves pool. This proposal underscores frustrations among the emerging market economies at having to rely on the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund which are seen as reflecting the interests of the US and Europe. The UN Development Programme Report 2013 highlights this point and suggests that emerging economies need their own institutions to support their growth. The Report goes so far as to say that 20th century institutions do not meet the teutonic changes taking place in the so called "South" in the 21st century.

Conclusion

Freer trade and open markets is how the world has always grown and become richer and more developed from ancient times, therefore in the 21st century with the lions' share of growth of middle classes in the emerging world, it is a no brainer for the US and Europe to break down barriers to enhance trade with the emerging economies of the world. In fact the tables have turned and the US and Europe, for the first time in a while, now need the emerging economies as much as the emerging economies once depended on the US and Europe.

Geography and Demography are Destiny

Geographical view of the Américas

Geography is the backdrop of human history. The position of a country on a map is the first element that truely defines it, so much more than its government is able to. Geographical distortions can be as revealing of the long-range intentions of governments, for example, the melting of the Arctic, allows a glimpse of the possible future shipping routes between Asia and Europe and the geo-trade options that this could bring about.

Demography is destiny

The US is in the midst of a new demographic, cultural and political moment. Interestingly the extension of the US border southwards in the early 19th Century to incorporate newly won land from México into the US is now facing a seismic demographic change in the 21st century - in coming decades hispanos from the wider Américas will become more than a quarter of the US electorate. 

Hispanos currently represent 17pc of the US population, and hispanic population growth is set to turn the US into a country where fewer than half the population will be non-Hispanic whites within 20 years. This shift will create a new demographic reality in the US. This point was heavily illustrated in the messages of Obama's recent presidential inauguration speech. A Cuban-American became the first hispano to recite the official inaugural poem. Rev Luis León delivered an inaugural benediction with phrases spoken in Spanish. And Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the first hispanic on the Supreme Court, administered the oath of office to Vice President Joe Biden.

Geography and Economic Growth

The notion that Mexico offers only cheap labour no longer rings true in the 21st Century. México produces around 115,000 engineering students every year, almost three times as many as the US on an annual basis. Hence machine specialists are usually easier to find in Tijuana than in many big US cities. As are, accountants experienced in production economics and other highly skilled workers.

Today, in the 21st century, Tijuana is becoming to San Diego what Shenzhen is to Hong Kong. Travel between San Diego and Tijuana is around 20 minutes, with no passport required. Although a passport is needed to come back, but there are fast-track lanes for business people. Many employees commute across the border each day, good doctors are cheaper and easier to find in Tijuana, as are private schools. In some ways, the border feels more like the  borders between the members of the EU than a divide between two countries.

And it’s not just Tijuana. To the east, in Juárez, Dell computers are built by Foxconn, the company that manufactures more than 40pc of the world’s electronics (including Apple’s iPhone and iPad). To the south, in Querétaro, a factory builds the transmissions that General Motors installs in its Corvettes. The design of General Electric’s GEnx turbine jet engine and the production of interior elements of Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner also happen in México. In fact, manufactured goods are the country’s chief export, with private investment in this sector among the highest in the world.

Once again geography is destiny too, the shorter and more nimble a supply chain is, the better. Hence México is benefiting from its proximity to the US to feed the demand for just-in-time manufacturing. And the demographics of producing the right mix of highly-skilled workers have combined with it to create growth and prosperity in the 21st Century. 

The Pacific Century is getting underway

Map of the Asia Pacific Region

The US and the Pacific

Rarely has Rarotonga, the main city of the Cook Islands, seen so many important world leaders at its annual summit of the Pacific Islands Forum as at this year's event with the US Secretary of State in attendance. But this is indicative of the wider US' policy of the re-balancing of the US' strategic posture away from Europe and the Atlantic towards the Pacific. 

The competition for influence in the Pacific Islands recalls the days when they were more significant, both economically and strategically in the 19th Century when boats sailed readily from European countries in search of trading opportunities. In contrast, the 20th Century was very much an Atlantic Century dominated by the US and Europe.

Russia's Pacific Side

Russia has just inaugurated the longest cable bridge in the world, measuring 3,100 metres between Russky Island and Vladivostok. The bridge is quite spectacular, it is as tall as the Eiffel Tower and was built for the APEC Heads of State meeting. As such, the bridge is a symbol of Russia's plans to develop its Pacific side and strengthen its ties with its Pacific side, which in the words of Putin is "the most important geopolitical task" for the 21st century. 

Russia's new Vladivostok Bridge on its Pacific Coast

Europe is set to become the biggest loser

So far the impact of the shift in power from Europe to the Asia Pacific has been greatly underestimated by Europe. Interestingly, Asia has developed so fast that its population has not adjusted to their growth in prosperity by taking its foot off the throttle the way people have in Europe — opting for more leisure and higher levels of public spending. In Asia, people continue to work as hard as they did when they were much poorer.

For example, the average UK citizen works 1625 hours a year — a 35-hour week with four weeks’ holiday plus bank holidays. This compares with 2307 hours in Singapore and 2287 in Hong Kong. In economic terms, this means the Singaporean is working the equivalent of four months a year more than Europeans do. 

Add to that the top rate of income tax in Singapore is 20pc and in Hong Kong 15pc, and the net effect is that per capita GDP in Singapore is 30pc higher than in the UK, and in Hong Kong it is 50pc higher. The gap is widening as people in Asia show little sign of slackening off. Furthermore, life expectancy rates are also on the rise. 

Therefore, changes in Europe to compete with this blast of competition from Asia Pacific will have to be more fundamental and far-reaching than anything European politicians have yet dared suggest. The West has allowed its cost base to become bloated. Unless this is tackled, the future looks bleak, with many other countries going the way of Greece through stagnation to economic near-collapse with all the accompanying political implications that will test democracy.

Conclusion

The Geo-Trade Blog predicts that the next decade is going to see closer regional cooperation around the world – in América Latina, and in Asia too and maybe even in Africa. Basically if your neighbour’s house is on fire, then your house is on fire too, it makes sense to work together to prevent fires in the first place although the Geo-Trade Blog expects this to be a long and tortuous process.

Furthermore, the last few years have seen economics and politics pulling in opposite directions. The economics calls for more labour mobility; the politics argues for closed borders, particularly in Europe and the US. The economics calls for investment in the productive potential of the economy for 21st Century but  the politics is dominated by older voters in Europe and the US for whom the prime issue is the debt that society owes them for a lifetime of work. These two positions look very challenging to reconcile.


 

The Rise of Las Américas in the 21st Century

Panamá City Skyline in the 21st Century

The Decade of América Latina

The market orientated reforms of the 1980s and the 1990s combined with several years of commodity-driven prosperity have been transforming América Latina into a region of wealth and prosperity over the last decade. The commodity boom together with more progressive social policies has started to create more dynamic and less unequal societies across the region.

Thanks to the commodity boom and rising revenues, governments have presided over a time of rising incomes for the new emerging middle classes in many countries in América Latina. However the increase in wealth has been occurring against a background of an ideological battle between reformers (mostly liberals and social democrat politicians) and those such as Mr Chávez (Venezuela) and potentially President Christina Kirchner (Argentina) and others of the ALBA grouping who would rather return to the authoritarian and populist past. At present the reformers appear to be winning the debate. This is illustrated below in the Economist's Latinobarómetro published in October 2011. Even so there has been a slight fall in optimism over the last year. This chart clearly shows Panamá with the most ongoing optimistic outlook. 

Latinobarómetro Source: The Economist Oct. 2011

 

What of the northern neighbours – the US

The US, América Latina's northern neighbour on the same continent has so far failed to appreciate the rising importance of América Latina with its expanding market for the north's exports, its huge investment opportunities, its enormous reserves of energy and minerals and its continuing supply of needed labour. However at the same time and despite their recent growth and globalisation, the economies of América Latina still depend on the US for capital, know-how, technology and remittances.

If geography is destiny and the US and América Latina need one another so much, the obvious question is why are the two not pursuing a more joint approach to consolidate their relations in a meaningful way? The answer to this question turns on key policy differences on three main areas. Firstly, immigration, many in América Latina find the idea of building a wall between the México and the US particularly offensive. Secondly, the war on drugs, the North's war on drug trafficking serves mainly to spread corruption, increase criminal violence and generally undermine the rule of law. Finally, the embargo on Cuba imposed by the US is seen as counter-productive and likely to have prolonged the repressive rule of the Castro brothers rather than ending it. However none of these policy issues is easily resolved due to domestic US politics and less so in an election year. Immigration has been a particularly toxic issue in the Republican primaries. To make progress in the war on drugs, the US needs to curb demand for illegal narcotics at home, but US politicians are loathe broach the the idea of decriminalisation. And the Cuba policy is held hostage by the swing state of Florida and its residents of Cuban origen.

Panamá, the Singapore of the Americas

Panamá is the success story of the first decade of the 21st century. Business of all kinds continues to grow, in a land coveted in the late 17th century by the pirate Henry Morgan and occupied since the beginning of the 20th century by the US President Roosevelt, to build the Panamá canal and link the Pacific with the Atlantic on the narrow isthmus. During many decades, the country has served as a hiding place for multiple legal and illegal dealings, from drugs to weapons and political conspiracies and money laundering.

Nevertheless the Panamá of the 21^st century has many feathers to its bow: a chanel, an international banking center, the world's first merchant fleet, a free trade area which is one of the main bases for the collection and re-export of inland freight, an interoceanic railway, seven private ports and dozens of casinos and property developments (as the above picture shows). Panama in 2011 was placed at the head of economic growth in Las Américas, an increase of 10.6pc of GDP, against 9.2pc in 2010, according to the Statistics and Census Institute (INEC) of Panamá which likely explains the optimism in the Latinobarómetro above too. 

But the Elephant in the room is still... la droga

US President Nixon declared the war on drugs 40 years ago, interestingly the front that he opened in 1971 has survived all his successors up until now.

The Presidents of Brazil, Colombia and Mexico were the first to speak out on the failure of the war on drugs, Fernando Henrique Cardoso, Cesar Gaviria and Ernesto Zedillo respectively. Recently, the current president of Guatemala, Otto Perez, and the former President of Colombia, Juan Manuel Santos, have also spoken out to demand the opening of a debate on the decriminalization of drugs using the legitimacy granted to countries suffering the most tragic consequences of victims of the war on drugs. Honduras topped the global homicide rate, with 82.1 homicides per 100,000 population, followed by El Salvador. México has also been immersed in the drug war for the last six years, with almost 50,000 people dead and the homicide rate has increased by 65% since 2005 according to UN data.
 

The legitimacy of key leaders of América Latina speaking out, coupled with the figures of the dead has forced the US president, Barack Obama, to finally address the issue. In the US in April 2012 Obama said "We recognize our responsibility in this matter and I think it is entirely legitimate to engage in a discussion about whether the laws now in force are laws that perhaps are causing more harm than good in some areas." When Obama spoke, everyone understood: it is time to talk about drugs. The issue that is a constant drag on América Latina has finally reached the international agenda, a further sign of the América Latina's rise. 

 

New York's Manhattan Grid - a blueprint for the US' biggest city

Aerial view in 21st century of the Manhattan Grid started in 1811

Before it could rise into the sky, Manhattan had to first create the streets, avenues and blocks that would later support the 20th century skyscrapers. In the early 19th century, New York's population was continuing to increase having tripled to 96,373 since 1790 mostly due to the growing port. It was then predicted that 400,000 people would live in the city by 1860. The City planners were entrusted with planning the city in 1811. They proposed a grid for the future city stretching northward from roughly Houston Street to 155th Street in the faraway heights of Harlem as the layout in the photo (above) and map (below) show.

Manhattan Grid Plan

 

The Grid Plan

The grid plan is a type of city plan in which streets run at right angles to each other to form a grid. The Greeks and Romans used City Grids as did the Chinese from 1500 BC onwards. The Chinese Tang 唐 Dynasty laid out their capital city in a grid plan.

The Roman model was also used in Spanish settlements during the exploration of the Americas. In 1573, Felipe II compiled the Laws of the Indies to guide the construction and administration of cities in the Americas. The Laws specified a square or rectangular central plaza with eight principal streets running from the plaza's corners. The grid plan became popular with the start of the Renaissance in Northern Europe. In 1606, the newly founded city of Mannheim in Germany was the first Renaissance city laid out in the grid plan as the map below shows. 

Mannheim Grid Plan

 

Why use grids?

An inherent advantage of the geometry of a proper grid is its tendency to provide regular building space in well-spaced sequences. This maximises the use of the land of a block without affecting street frequency - any frequency of streets produces the same packing effect. Furthermore geometry also minimises disputes over lot boundaries and maximises the number of lots that can front a given street.

Another important aspect of street grids is that traffic flows of either pedestrians, cars, or both, only cross at right angles. This is an important safety feature, since no one entering the intersection needs to look over their shoulder to see oncoming traffic. Hence the grid is a geometric response to our human physiology. It is highly likely that the original purpose of grid layouts comes from the Athenian Agora where the laying out of market stalls into regularised rows at right angles solved the problem of frequent wagon collisions that occurred when the markets were laid out randomly in a field with traffic approaches at odd angles.

New York's Manhattan Grid

The Manhattan grid plan was a far-reaching, visionary and daring plan to urbanize the geographical limits of the Island of Manhattan.The plan called for a regular grid of streets and property lines without regard to the topography of the island itself. This included numbered avenues running north and south roughly parallel to the shore of the Hudson River. The avenues would begin with First Avenue on the east side and run through Twelfth Avenue in the west. There would also be 155 orthogonal cross streets. 

Interestingly, Manhattan’s grid is not perfectly regular. No two blocks are ever precisely the same because the grid indulges variety, building to building, street to street. Some avenues are wider. Broadway cuts diagonally across the north-south streets, and those cuts have made room for public spaces (Union Square, Madison Square, Herald Square, Times Square, Columbus Circle, Verdi Square). 

New York’s grid has proved flexible enough to adapt when the city’s orientation has shifted north-south, and flexible enough to accommodate the creation of Central Park which interestingly was not a part of the original grid plan. It was not until 1853 that the idea for a large area of green space for leisure activities was envisioned.
 

One of the advantages of the Manhattan city grid is that it makes a complex place instantly navigable. Manhattan invites long walks, because walkers can judge distances easily and always know where they are. In contrast other cities such as London which are formed from historic agglomerations of villages, often include vast stretches of nowhere land as they sprawl in ways that discourage easy comprehension and walking. 

 

Finally, perhaps one of the greatest benefits of the Manhattan grid is that it gives order through physical form to a city filled with a diversity of ideas, concepts and people from so many different places. It is not likely that this is exactly what the original city planners had in mind back when they proposed that the Manhattan Grid should "promote the health of the City" back in 1811.