New Trade Routes through the Arctic between Asia and Europe

 

Map of new shipping routes between Asia and Europe Source: The Economist

New Shipping routes between Asia and Europe 

The ice in the Artic is melting away at a record-breaking rate opening up new possibilities for shipping routes. Measurements taken in August 2012 found the levels of Arctic sea ice were at their lowest levels since satellites began measuring the ice in 1979. In 30 to 40 years, it is quite possible that there will not be no summer ice at all. This has led to an increased interest in shipping in the Arctic. New shipping routes opening up due to the melting ice could cut shipping times between Asian and European ports by up to a third. It is possible that the first commercial trade voyage could take place as early as summer 2013 led by China, and the potential value of goods travelling the new Arctic routes could become highly significant.

Xue Long 雪龙 expedition throught the Northern Sea Route 

China has been taking a strong interest in the region over the last decade, building a physical presence and using diplomacy and trade ties to engage in the region. The Chinese ship Xue Long (Snow Dragon) 雪龙 became the first ship to sail the Bering Sea after crushing the ice across the Arctic Ocean in August 2012. The icebreaker sailed all along the Northern Sea Route into the Barents Sea and returned by sailing a straight line from Iceland to the Bering Strait via the North Pole.

China has also set up a multidisciplinary research base with 18 researchers called the Yellow River Station on Svalbard the Norwegian archipelago (See map above) since 2004. The Xue Long 雪龙 voyage in summer 2012 was a culmination of China's research so far and a test of the Northern sea route to check out the feasibility of it becoming a new shipping route through the Artic that could link Asian and European ports. China has also recently commissioned a new 120m icebreaker ship to be built by a company in Finland to further its Arctic research. 

New Asian permanent observers on the Arctic Council in 2013 

The rules of the Arctic Council state that only countries with territories in the Arctic can become full members of the Artic Council. Nevertherless at the biennial meeting of the Council on 15 May 2012 in Sweden, 5 Asian countries: China, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, India and Italy became permanent observers. China, sees itself as a “near-Arctic state”, and had been seeking to become a permanent observer since 2006 (it had previously has its application rejected three times). But this time with Iceland's support and with the possibility of China and Iceland setting up a new Arctic forum, the members of the Arctic Council decided to widen the Council to include their Asian counterparts.

Interestingly, most of the new joiners were already observers on an ad hoc basis. The six new members will not have speaking or voting rights. But they will be able to influence decisions in the council’s six working groups with their expertise, research and potential funding of initiatives in the Arctic. China, for example, has led five marine expeditions in the Arctic since 1999, including the Xue Long 雪龙 voyage in summer 2012. Japan and South Korea may decide to conduct their research with their own icebreakers ships too. The new Asian observers will bring fresh new ideas to the Arctic region and advance the use of new faster trade routes between Asia and Europe over coming years. The Geo-Trade Blog will continue to follow developments in the Arctic.

The Arctic in the 21st Century - a New Polar Frontier

Arctic Ocean Ice Breaker

In April 2010 Russian President Medvedev paid a state visit to Norway. The highlight of this visit was a surprise announcement – after 40 years of negotiations – an agreement on the division of a disputed zone in the Arctic Ocean into roughly equal parts for Russia and Norway. A newly agreed Arctic maritime delimitation line was announced accompanied by treaty provisions for new rules and procedures to ensure responsible management of natural resources. The disputed territory measured 175,000 sq km which is equivalent to about half of the land territory of Norway.

Map of Arctic Region Boundaries

Experts believe that the oil potential of the formerly disputed parts of the Arctic Ocean could be more than 5 bn metric tonnes of oil – 10-times Saudi Arabia's production potential and still larger gas reserves 10,000 bn cubic metres of natural gas – five times Norway's proven reserves. But experts argue the high cost and inaccessibility of these resources mean large-scale development of these resources could be years away.

Russian interests in the Arctic

Russia has long held an interest in the Arctic. Indeed, Russia underlined the importance of the Arctic by declaring its plans to make the Arctic Region its primary resource base by 2020 in its 2009 Arctic Strategy. PM Putin visited Russia's Arctic territory shortly after President Medvedec's visit to Norway last year, where he proclaimed the Arctic's importance was in “Russia's deepest geopolitical interests”. Russia sees itself along with Norway as the two “principle Arctic countries” although it reluctantly acknowledges the need for cooperation with the other Arctic countries: US, Canada and Denmark.

However Russia's political ambitions are not reflected by its technical and financial reality. Russia badly needs international technical expertise to implement cutting-edge projects in such difficult acreage, and money to begin exploration in the offshore Russian Arctic. Hence the recently announced deal in January this year between the British company BP and the Russian company Rosneft to work together to extract oil from above Russia's Arctic Circle. The deal recognises the importance of BP's geological know-how with BP swapping a 5pc stake in itself for a 9.5pc share of Rosenef.

Chinese interests in the Arctic

China is not an Arctic state. Nor does it have an official Arctic Strategy yet. Nevertheless it is increasingly active and vocal on the international stage on issues concerning the region.

In recent years China has been trying to bolster its position in the Arctic by seeking observer status on the Arctic Council (which was denied). China has also emphasized the rule of law in the Arctic. In an article in the Asia Times, in February 2011, Rear Admiral Yin Zhin was quoted saying:

“The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the North Pole and surrounding areas are the commonwealth of the world’s people and do not belong to any one country… China must play an indispensable role in Arctic exploration as we have one-fifth of the world’s population.”

Chinese oil companies are not yet in a position where they can offer technical expertise. But in the near future, it is highly possible that China could become a major player in the Arctic by financing Russian activities in the region.

Environmentally Sensitive Arctic

It is estimated that the Arctic region holds 25pc of the world’s oil and 9pc of the world’s coal and it is one of the last remaining regions that has not been mined for resources.

Many believe the sensitive Arctic environment is the last place that should be drilled for oil because the risks just aren't worth it. In July 2010, Environmental NGOs called for moratorium on new offshore drilling in the environmentally sensitive Arctic. The calls for a moratorium echo growing concerns across the Arctic that industry needs to prove Arctic oil development will not cause catastrophic damage to the Arctic environment. A US environmental NGO, the Pew Foundation, recently published this video about the risks of Arctic exploration:

What is the future for the Arctic?

In the 21^st century, the Arctic is fast becoming a new Geo-strategic region in natural energy resources, as competition for its massive untapped reserves of oil, gas and coal heats up.

The presence of natural resources has increased the incentives for Arctic countries to settle old maritime territorial claims, largely because no private company will invest without them. But the process of deciding who owns what is aided by international law but often not fully resolved. As a consequence, we should expect much competition and jostling in the foreseeable future among the 5 Arctic countries and their investors as they stake their claims to the Arctic's wealth of natural resources.

But it is also worthwhile remembering that resources are not always mined because they are there but rather because the price is right or because the politics are right (preferably both). The key issue in large parts of the Arctic will be to understand the political risks and whether the necessary long-term investments in infrastructure are made in this previously unexploited polar region.